The Executive Suites Model: Better Homes and Gardens Real Estate Executive – Seattle, Washington
Posted on 01. Sep, 2009 by Robert Albanese
(From a phone interview with Keith Nelson, CEO)
As early on as 1991 with only 25 agents, Keith Nelson, CEO of Better Homes and Gardens Real Estate Executive in Seattle Washington was already experimenting with alternate business models. Over time, his concept of “executive suite” type locations has emerged as a strong operational alternative. The basic principles behind his executive suite model include;
- Moving past the need for huge facilities, but locations in the community are necessary
- Locations include niche local office suites for agents
- Functionally, in a good “class A” type building adds competitive advantages.
- Executive Suite type locations have very low monthly costs that include:
- Unmanned locations
- Accessed via a secure card
- Between 400 and 1000 SF, but usually between 800 and 1000 SF
- Equipped with 1 – 2 conference rooms and an open area for equipment and sales activities
- Reception, phones, copy machines, fax machines, refreshments, etc. are available and billed on a consumption basis.
Mr. Nelson notes that the average “session time” for his agents is about 20 minutes. That is, agents stop by to mail forms, drop off transactional documents and then move on to sales activities. Agents do not use satellite locations for all of their customer meetings and often execute contracts where it is most convenient for the customer.
Points to consider
Agents still prefer to hang their license in the office where they work, so it’s advisable to continue traditional practice in this area. Mr. Nelson is currently considering dedicating an agent to each office between the hours of 10 am and 3 pm to accommodate walk in clients, although walk-ins are not a major factor. Some suites have signage while other “building” regulations restrict the use of company signage. Nelson makes it very clear that the ability to have signage is by far the preferable situation.
Space Availability
Interestingly, Better Homes and Gardens Real Estate Executive has no issues with availability of conference rooms. Conference rooms are used exclusively for customer meetings, rather than conference calls or agents-to-agent meetings. In addition, many vendors (title, mortgage) allow sales agents to use their conference rooms for client meetings, freeing up even more space in Executive’s offices. Mr. Nelson also keenly observes that most real estate companies have policies preventing clients from entering the agent desk area and as a result, the difference in office size has little or no impact on the consumer’s experience.
Management Style and Climate in an “Executive Suites” model
Many independent contractors prefer to work without being micro-managed, so real estate companies need to develop balanced leadership styles. On the other hand, the situation is simplified by the fact that office politics all but disappear in this type of environment. Some practices that have worked well for Nelson include the following;
- Regular, formal communications keep agents informed of developments (new laws, tools and services) and take the place of traditional office meetings
- Agent phone numbers are displayed on every sign, drawing listing leads to the listing agents
- Company leadership is easily accessible via phone and e-mail, making communication quicker and more efficient
What’s next for Executive?
Keith Nelson clearly understands the need to continue his company’s evolutionary process by finding newer and better ways to serve the needs of consumers and agents alike. The next iteration of Better Homes and Gardens Real Estate Executive will include updating to office locations that possess a newer ‘look and feel’. Building on the model already described in this blog, anticipated enhancements include;
- Signage for every location
- Agent coverage for a portion of the work day (10 am -3 pm) in every location
- Technology upgrades, and
- Increased availability of “non-formal” work areas
|






Stephanie Jacques
02. Sep, 2009
This sounds ideal. Missing is the availability for one stop shop where the loan officer is also a part of this team. I can’t ignore the need for administrative staff either and for the large company, where would they work from here? We are in a region where some folks still can’t get access to high speed- unfortunately that includes me which is a surprise considering how much I reach into the social media bandwagon. Always curious how this would change the commission arrangements the company has with it’s agents. What would reducing overhead costs do to the way money is allocated and would the agent be offered a higher pay as a result?
Bob Albanese
02. Sep, 2009
You raise excellent questions here. I will not answer for Keith, but I do know that he has outstanding relationships in terms of mortgage and title etc and runs the administrative part of his process from a central headquarters. We will need to defer to him for further details on this.
In terms of compensation schedules, surely there would be change. However, how the schedule changes will vary form market to market and from business model to business model. The end result would nevertheless be that revenues, now committed to facilities, would be available for other important initiatives.
Thank you for your response
Bob
CJ Brasiel
03. Sep, 2009
I was under the impression that the new RESPA regulations would not allow real estate agents to use title facilities for meetings. Is this correct?
Robert Jaekel
16. Sep, 2009
Bob: Very interesting concept, although it would not work in states like New Jersey. New Jersey requires that all real estate offices must be supervised by a Real Estate Broker on a full time basis.
Bob Albanese
16. Sep, 2009
Hello Bob,
You are quite correct here. It is certainly possible however, to use the Executive Suites model in states like New Jersey, but companies would need to amend the model to include on-site broker managers.
You will note from my blog that Keith Nelson is moving toward having agent coverage in future months, which is a departure from earlier practice. So clearly this model and all business models must have the ability to morph with changing environments.
Thank you for your comment
Bob